Review




Structured Review

Tokyo Chemical Industry trip classification indicator
Trip Classification Indicator, supplied by Tokyo Chemical Industry, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/classification+indicator+trip/us12651211-183-15-18
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trip classification indicator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars

Images

Related Articles

other:

Article Title: A Novel Machine Learning Approach for Severity Classification of Diabetic Foot Complications Using Thermogram Images
Article Snippet: Such clustering was not found in the original classification using the TCI-based method (i.e., class one–class five).

Article Title: Dissimilar Trypanosoma cruzi genotype-specific serological profile assessed by Chagas-Flow ATE IgG1 upon benznidazole etiological treatment of chronic Chagas disease.
Article Snippet: Regardless no changes in the genotype-specific serology of NT (TcI = 6%; TcII = 94%), distinct T. cruzi genotype-specific sero-classification was detected for Bz-T samples at 5 Followup (TcII = 100%) as compared to Baseline (TcII = 97%; TcVI = 3%).

Article Title: Advances in the application of artificial intelligence-driven multi-modal imaging technologies in the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
Article Snippet: [52] et al., attained a mean accuracy of 94.53% in the TCI five-grade classification task.

Article Title: Dirac surface states in magnonic analogs of topological crystalline insulators
Article Snippet: During the last decade, it has been recognized that crystalline symmetries lead to a more refined classification of phases, so-called topological crystalline insulators (TCI) [30–33].


Article Title: Comparison of conditioned Latin hypercube and feature space coverage sampling for predicting soil classes using simulation from soil maps
Article Snippet: Category Description, abbreviation and references Local terrain attribute Elevation (EL), Aspect (AS)(Horn, 1981), Mean slope (MS)(Dietrich and Montgomery, 1998), Steepest slope (SS)(Tarboton, 1997), Plan curvature (PLC), Profile curvature (PRC), Horizontal curvature(HOC)(Shary et al., 2002), and Relative elevation (RE) Regional terrain attribute Distance to stream (DTS), Local elevation above channel network (LECN)(MacMillan et al., 2000), Elevation below culmination line for mountain areas (EBCLM), Elevation below culmination line for lowland (EBCLL), Relative hillslope position for mountain areas (RHPM), Relative hillslope position for lowlands (RHPL)(Hatfield, 1999), Crest index for mountain areas (CIM), and Crest index for lowlands (CIL) Combined terrain attribute Terrain classification index (TCI) Other Soil moisture (SM), Diffuse radiation (DFR), and Direct radiation (DRR) For Raffelson we similarily used the above strategy to select a master sample of 10,000 raster cells out of the total 34,760 raster cells, using the sixteen soil classes as strata.

Article Title: Dissimilar Trypanosoma cruzi genotype-specific serological profile assessed by Chagas-Flow ATE IgG1 upon benznidazole etiological treatment of chronic Chagas disease.
Article Snippet: Regard- less no changes in the genotype-specific serology of NT (TcI = 6%; TcII = 94%), distinct T. cruzi genotype-specific sero-classification was detected for Bz-T samples at 5Years Follow- up (TcII = 100%) as compared to Baseline (TcII = 97%; TcVI = 3%).



Similar Products

99
Oxford Instruments 3d object surface classification
3d Object Surface Classification, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/Imaris/pm42277434-402-1-0
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d object surface classification - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Dandong Yichuang Pharmaceutical Co Ltd machine learning classification
Machine Learning Classification, supplied by Dandong Yichuang Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/classification+learning+machine/pmc12905990-43-6-23
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
machine learning classification - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Biodesign International Inc classification ia pugtdb database
Classification Ia Pugtdb Database, supplied by Biodesign International Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/classification+database+ia+pugtdb/pm42314050-299-24-29
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
classification ia pugtdb database - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Protox Therapeutics ld50 classification
Ld50 Classification, supplied by Protox Therapeutics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/0+3+protox+server/pm42316907-90-3-5
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ld50 classification - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Hirschmann cpak classification
Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee <t>(CPAK)</t> classification with nine theoretical knee types. Source : Adapted from MacDessi et al. . <t>aHKA,</t> <t>arithmetic</t> hip–knee–ankle angle; HKA, hip–knee–ankle angle; JLO, joint line obliquity; LDFA, lateral distal femoral angle; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle.
Cpak Classification, supplied by Hirschmann, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/classification+cpak/pmc13274546-53-17-14
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cpak classification - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Omics Data Automation cancer subtype classification leveraging multi omics data
Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee <t>(CPAK)</t> classification with nine theoretical knee types. Source : Adapted from MacDessi et al. . <t>aHKA,</t> <t>arithmetic</t> hip–knee–ankle angle; HKA, hip–knee–ankle angle; JLO, joint line obliquity; LDFA, lateral distal femoral angle; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle.
Cancer Subtype Classification Leveraging Multi Omics Data, supplied by Omics Data Automation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/cancer+data+multi+omics+pan/pm42300227-445-12-16
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cancer subtype classification leveraging multi omics data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Biotechnology Information ncbi taxonomy browser
Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee <t>(CPAK)</t> classification with nine theoretical knee types. Source : Adapted from MacDessi et al. . <t>aHKA,</t> <t>arithmetic</t> hip–knee–ankle angle; HKA, hip–knee–ankle angle; JLO, joint line obliquity; LDFA, lateral distal femoral angle; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle.
Ncbi Taxonomy Browser, supplied by Biotechnology Information, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/biotechnology+database+information+ncbi/pm42272257-229-11-9
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ncbi taxonomy browser - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Tokyo Chemical Industry trip classification indicator
Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee <t>(CPAK)</t> classification with nine theoretical knee types. Source : Adapted from MacDessi et al. . <t>aHKA,</t> <t>arithmetic</t> hip–knee–ankle angle; HKA, hip–knee–ankle angle; JLO, joint line obliquity; LDFA, lateral distal femoral angle; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle.
Trip Classification Indicator, supplied by Tokyo Chemical Industry, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/classification+indicator+trip/us12651211-183-15-18
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trip classification indicator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Carollo Engineers ddi severity classification algorithms
Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee <t>(CPAK)</t> classification with nine theoretical knee types. Source : Adapted from MacDessi et al. . <t>aHKA,</t> <t>arithmetic</t> hip–knee–ankle angle; HKA, hip–knee–ankle angle; JLO, joint line obliquity; LDFA, lateral distal femoral angle; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle.
Ddi Severity Classification Algorithms, supplied by Carollo Engineers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/algorithms+classification+ddi+severity/pm42261122-78-8-24
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ddi severity classification algorithms - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Kaggle Inc brain tumor classification mri dataset
Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee <t>(CPAK)</t> classification with nine theoretical knee types. Source : Adapted from MacDessi et al. . <t>aHKA,</t> <t>arithmetic</t> hip–knee–ankle angle; HKA, hip–knee–ankle angle; JLO, joint line obliquity; LDFA, lateral distal femoral angle; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle.
Brain Tumor Classification Mri Dataset, supplied by Kaggle Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/brain+dataset+mri+tumor/pm42250854-404-1-6
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
brain tumor classification mri dataset - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification with nine theoretical knee types. Source : Adapted from MacDessi et al. . aHKA, arithmetic hip–knee–ankle angle; HKA, hip–knee–ankle angle; JLO, joint line obliquity; LDFA, lateral distal femoral angle; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle.

Journal: Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Article Title: Speaking the same language? A direct cartography between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK

doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70801

Figure Lengend Snippet: Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification with nine theoretical knee types. Source : Adapted from MacDessi et al. . aHKA, arithmetic hip–knee–ankle angle; HKA, hip–knee–ankle angle; JLO, joint line obliquity; LDFA, lateral distal femoral angle; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle.

Article Snippet: The present study aimed to establish a theoretical mapping between the FKP described by Hirschmann and the CPAK classification by analytically deriving the arithmetic HKA angle and JLO from FMA and TMA.

Techniques:

Deterministic mapping between functional knee phenotypes (FMA mean = x ‐coordinate − TMA mean = y ‐coordinate) and CPAK classification femoral. The x ‐axis represents the femoral mechanical angle (FMA): values to the left (FMA < 93°) correspond to varus femoral orientation, values to the right (FMA > 93°) to valgus femoral orientation. The y ‐axis represents the tibial mechanical angle (TMA): values below (TMA < 87°) correspond to varus tibial orientation, values above (TMA > 87°) to valgus tibial orientation. Population means (FMA = 93°, TMA = 87°) serve as phenotypic neutrality references per the Hirschmann classification. CPAK, Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee.

Journal: Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Article Title: Speaking the same language? A direct cartography between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK

doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70801

Figure Lengend Snippet: Deterministic mapping between functional knee phenotypes (FMA mean = x ‐coordinate − TMA mean = y ‐coordinate) and CPAK classification femoral. The x ‐axis represents the femoral mechanical angle (FMA): values to the left (FMA < 93°) correspond to varus femoral orientation, values to the right (FMA > 93°) to valgus femoral orientation. The y ‐axis represents the tibial mechanical angle (TMA): values below (TMA < 87°) correspond to varus tibial orientation, values above (TMA > 87°) to valgus tibial orientation. Population means (FMA = 93°, TMA = 87°) serve as phenotypic neutrality references per the Hirschmann classification. CPAK, Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee.

Article Snippet: The present study aimed to establish a theoretical mapping between the FKP described by Hirschmann and the CPAK classification by analytically deriving the arithmetic HKA angle and JLO from FMA and TMA.

Techniques: Functional Assay

Correspondence between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK types across femoral (FMA = x ‐coordinate) and tibial (TMA = y ‐coordinate) mechanical angle intervals. Each functional phenotype corresponds to a 3° angular interval, defined as ± 1.5° around the central femoral (FMA) and tibial (TMA) mechanical angle values. The table illustrates the theoretical mapping between these FMA–TMA intervals and the CPAK classification. When the angular interval of a phenotype intersects several CPAK regions, multiple CPAK types are listed within the same cell. CPAK, Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee.

Journal: Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Article Title: Speaking the same language? A direct cartography between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK

doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70801

Figure Lengend Snippet: Correspondence between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK types across femoral (FMA = x ‐coordinate) and tibial (TMA = y ‐coordinate) mechanical angle intervals. Each functional phenotype corresponds to a 3° angular interval, defined as ± 1.5° around the central femoral (FMA) and tibial (TMA) mechanical angle values. The table illustrates the theoretical mapping between these FMA–TMA intervals and the CPAK classification. When the angular interval of a phenotype intersects several CPAK regions, multiple CPAK types are listed within the same cell. CPAK, Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee.

Article Snippet: The present study aimed to establish a theoretical mapping between the FKP described by Hirschmann and the CPAK classification by analytically deriving the arithmetic HKA angle and JLO from FMA and TMA.

Techniques: Functional Assay

Distribution of functional knee phenotypes according to the Hirschmann and MacDessi (CPAK) classifications in osteoarthritic (OA) and non‐osteoarthritic (NO) populations. CPAK distributions obtained from the Hirschmann functional phenotype cohort are compared with those reported in the original CPAK cohort (MacDessi) in NO and OA populations. Four attribution strategies were applied: mean, using the central FMA and TMA values; interval, considering the full angular ranges (±1.5°) of each phenotype; stochastic, using Monte Carlo sampling within these intervals; and rare, selecting CPAK types located at the margins of the compatible aHKA–JLO space. aHKA, arithmetic hip–knee–ankle angle; CPAK, Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee; FMA, femoral mechanical angle; JLO, joint line obliquity; TMA, total knee arthroplasty.

Journal: Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Article Title: Speaking the same language? A direct cartography between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK

doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70801

Figure Lengend Snippet: Distribution of functional knee phenotypes according to the Hirschmann and MacDessi (CPAK) classifications in osteoarthritic (OA) and non‐osteoarthritic (NO) populations. CPAK distributions obtained from the Hirschmann functional phenotype cohort are compared with those reported in the original CPAK cohort (MacDessi) in NO and OA populations. Four attribution strategies were applied: mean, using the central FMA and TMA values; interval, considering the full angular ranges (±1.5°) of each phenotype; stochastic, using Monte Carlo sampling within these intervals; and rare, selecting CPAK types located at the margins of the compatible aHKA–JLO space. aHKA, arithmetic hip–knee–ankle angle; CPAK, Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee; FMA, femoral mechanical angle; JLO, joint line obliquity; TMA, total knee arthroplasty.

Article Snippet: The present study aimed to establish a theoretical mapping between the FKP described by Hirschmann and the CPAK classification by analytically deriving the arithmetic HKA angle and JLO from FMA and TMA.

Techniques: Functional Assay, Sampling

Hirschmann‐CPAK (HCT‐9) reading grid. CPAK, Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee; FMA, femoral mechanical angle; HCT‐9, Hirschmann–CPAK Translational grid; TMA, tibial mechanical angle.

Journal: Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Article Title: Speaking the same language? A direct cartography between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK

doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70801

Figure Lengend Snippet: Hirschmann‐CPAK (HCT‐9) reading grid. CPAK, Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee; FMA, femoral mechanical angle; HCT‐9, Hirschmann–CPAK Translational grid; TMA, tibial mechanical angle.

Article Snippet: The present study aimed to establish a theoretical mapping between the FKP described by Hirschmann and the CPAK classification by analytically deriving the arithmetic HKA angle and JLO from FMA and TMA.

Techniques: